home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
030193
/
03019933.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
4KB
|
87 lines
<text id=93TT1055>
<title>
Mar. 01, 1993: The Next Dose of Medicine
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Mar. 01, 1993 You Say You Want a Revolution...
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
COVER STORIES, Page 28
The Next Dose of Medicine
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By PRISCILLA PAINTON--With reporting by Michael Duffy and Dan Goodgame/Washington
</p>
<p> Many Americans took last week's call for "contributions" in
the spirit of a bracing tonic, bitter but salutary. But how
will they feel about being asked to drink from the same cup
two months from now?
</p>
<p> To fund his grandest reforms--from a health-care system to
an industrial policy--Bill Clinton is sure to come back a
few months from now with another appeal to sacrifice. Less than
48 hours after hitting up Americans for $246 billion in new
taxes over four years, Clinton was already discussing the idea
of a national sales tax as if it were a not too distant possibility.
"I did not mean to float a trial balloon," Clinton said Friday,
as the issue threatened to engulf his campaign to push his first
round of tax proposals. Meanwhile in Washington, Clinton's Budget
Director, Leon Panetta, brought up the likelihood of new taxes
on guns, alcohol and tobacco. "It's a bit too early to say,"
Panetta said, but then he went ahead and said it.
</p>
<p> In his speech Clinton emphasized the importance of his health-care
plan but left out any reference to what it would cost: additional
taxes in the range of $30 billion to $90 billion a year by 1997.
The President argues that health-care reform could save large
sums for the economy, but federal spending will go up. In addition
to a national sales tax and the so-called sin taxes, the Administration
is considering a number of other levies to recapture the savings
that private companies will enjoy from a national health-care
system. The taxes were described in a memo, which was leaked
to the Wall Street Journal, from Clinton adIra Magaziner to
task-force leader Hillary Rodham Clinton. Among the levies discussed:
taxes on benefit plans that offer coverage above a certain level
(currently all employee health-care benefits are exempt); a
corporate tax in addition to the general increase in the corporate
rate to 36% that the President proposed last week; and taxes
on "noncritical" health measures such as plastic surgery. The
President has also discussed with health-care experts limiting
the deductions that businesses can take for providing employee
health insurance.
</p>
<p> Clinton could restrain his need for new revenues by curtailing
his reformist ambitions: his aides have privately discussed
phasing in his health-care plan so that it covers all uninsured
children by the end of his first term and only grows to include
adults in his second. But even if he slows down on the health-care
front, Clinton is still left with expensive campaign promises.
Among them: his pledge to establish a program for college loans
that students could repay in national service instead of dollars,
which could cost as much as $30 billion. Then there is his vow
to "end welfare as we know it," which may save money in the
long run but require more spending on health care, child care,
job training and education. As he indicated in his speech Wednesday,
Clinton also seems intent on spending money to develop an industrial
policy by subsidizing technologies, industries and perhaps even
specific firms that Washington bureaucrats determine will create
new jobs and capture new markets. "It is not enough to pass
a budget or even to have a trade agreement," he said. "The world
is changing so fast that we must have aggressive, targeted attempts
to create the high-wage jobs of the future."
</p>
<p> What may eventually sour some taxpayers on Clinton's reforms
is the persistent trade-off of short-term pain for long-term
benefits. Before long, voters may develop a renewed taste for
1980s-style instant gratification, or at least the delivery
of promises within a four-year presidential term.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>